Skip to main content

The Problem With Ideas and How to Solve It

As I sit at home suffering through my second day of the flu, I find my mind oscillating between Breaking Bad (watching for the first time!), Lakers trade rumors, and side project ideas.

Today, I counted ~37 unique ideas for side projects, companies, and products. Now, here is the problem with ideas, they are a dime a dozen (maybe even less). While ideation is crucial for innovation, having too many ideas, or overemphasizing ideas can lead to mental paralysis.

Ideation Paralysis

When you have too many ideas in your head, you might feel compelled to be 'action-oriented'. You will feel compelled to dive in and start making progress towards one of those ideas. Most likely, you will either pick an idea at random, or pick one which feels the most compelling in the moment.

Now as you start building, more ideas will keep popping in your head. Some of these will be entirely new ideas and others will be ideas on how to implement the idea you are currently working on/thinking about.

This leads to a situation I call Ideation Paralysis. As you start working on the project, you are flooded with ideas that not only distract you from the actual implementation but also make you quickly lose interest in the project at-hand in favor of some other idea which feels more compelling in the moment. At the end of the day, you end up with 37 ideas, 3 unfinished projects, and no real product to launch. By this point, all your ideas are jumbled and mental fatigue takes over.

The (R)ICE framework for relative idea prioritization

This is a framework I like to use to prioritize my ideas and get over ideation paralysis. In this framework, we evaluate every single idea using three criteria (and an optional fourth) by rating the idea out of 10.

R (Optional) - Reach
I - Impact
C - Confidence
E - Ease

Reach - How many people can your idea affect? How big is the market size?
Impact - How much is going to affect something? The impact could be on revenue, churn, costs, impressions, customer satisfaction etc. This needs to be measurable.
Confidence - How do you know that your idea will have the desired reach and impact outcomes? The more data you have to support your assertion, the higher the confidence.
Ease -  How easy is it to implement/launch your idea? You can measure this in terms of time/cost/manpower.

Since this is a relative framework, the numbers don't mean anything by themselves. Simply, a 6 is better than a 5 and worse than an 8.  The only important thing, is to be consistent is your scoring and being objective about the outcomes.









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vanity, Greed, Trivia, and Platforms

Recently I started playing a trivia game called IQ Trivia on Twitter. This game is structurally very similar to the wildly popular HQ Trivia in that it has 12 questions and if you answer all 12 correctly, you split a cash prize with all the other winners. Now, I used to play HQ trivia religiously but gradually lost the drive to tune in every day, despite an upward momentum in their cash prize. I also played Cash Show and several other similar quiz formats to satiate my desire for competition.

However, recently when I restarted playing IQ Trivia, I spent some time thinking deeply about consumer behavior around these trivia games.


First, why do we play these games? There are three forces at play here - the allure of winning cash prizes, the self-imposed sense of smartness, intelligence, or accomplishment, and an elevation of social status due to money/intelligence.

Cash is king. No matter how much money you have in your bank account, you always want to compete hard when there is money …

What Founders Should Learn from the Fyre Festival

I recently watched the Fyre Festival documentary on Netflix and left with an uneasy feeling in my stomach. The documentary is riveting and has something for everyone - shock, drama, emotion, financial fraud, supermodels, and Ja Rule. Most importantly, it was chock full of learnings for early stage entrepreneurs.

Fyre Festival was a massive trainwreck of a "luxury music festival" started by Billy McFarland and rapper Ja Rule. Propped up by massive influencers like Kendall Jenner, Bella Hadid, and Emily Ratajkowski, the festival failed to deliver even basic amenities such as housing and food on the day of the event. Currently, the organizers are the subject of atleast eight major lawsuits for fraud.

What can founders learn from this failed entertainment startup (other than DO NOT COMMIT FRAUD)?



The power of influencer marketing

Fyre Festival's popularity was built on top of a massive influencer marketing campaign. Top supermodels were paid top dollar to post cryptic photos …

The Autonomous Last Mile Delivery Hunger Games

Today, Fedex announced their same-day delivery robot which signals another major player throwing their hat into the 'autonomous delivery bot' ring - following in the footsteps of Amazon Scout, Softbank-backed Nuro, Marble, Kiwi, and others.
Recently, I have been researching and thinking about this space where it seems like technological differentiation is minimal. It is essentially an AI driven 'service' where other than load-bearing specifications and radius of service, the bots can only be differentiated on their looks.
According to this McKinsey Report (which every single robodelivery company cites), autonomous delivery robots/vehicles (what do we classify them as?) will be responsible for 80% of all last mile deliveries. This is mostly driven by this basic business objective - reducing cost.
Last mile delivery is the biggest cost driver in the delivery landscape. Because of economies of scale, it is cheaper to ship bulk items from a centralized location/warehouse t…