Skip to main content

Biotech Platforms Primer

Biotech entrepreneurs ask themselves the same question software entrepreneurs ask.
"Do we want to build a platform or a product?"
Traditionally, entrepreneurs, both software and biotech, have focused on building single-product companies. In biotech, that means a specific drug, and in software it means providing a specific tool or service.
Now, platform startups are the rage, especially in silicon valley. 'Come for the tool, stay for the platform' has become the mantra for many early stage entrepreneurs.
In biotech, a platform essentially means providing centralized set of technologies and services to support the drug development process. This includes lab diagnostics, therapeutic protocols, antibodies, or testing devices. While product (drug) focused companies spend years (and tons of $$$) in research and clinical trials before making any money, platform companies see cash flow much earlier in their life cycle by licensing their platform to these drug manufacturers.
It is interesting that these biotech platforms look very similar, not to tech platforms like Twitch or Twitter, but more like the recent wave of VC platforms.
VC firms have started developing their internal platforms to provide additional support to their portfolio companies in addition to capital. This includes full-stack access to tools, resources, and personnel. It is a great way to create a competitive advantage and build a closer relationship with their founders while simultaneously building a village of competence around them. Similarly, these biotech platform companies get a chance to support the development of several different drugs simultaneously, build relationships with big pharmaceutical companies, and provide them (relatively) inexpensive drug development services.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vanity, Greed, Trivia, and Platforms

Recently I started playing a trivia game called IQ Trivia on Twitter. This game is structurally very similar to the wildly popular HQ Trivia in that it has 12 questions and if you answer all 12 correctly, you split a cash prize with all the other winners. Now, I used to play HQ trivia religiously but gradually lost the drive to tune in every day, despite an upward momentum in their cash prize. I also played Cash Show and several other similar quiz formats to satiate my desire for competition.

However, recently when I restarted playing IQ Trivia, I spent some time thinking deeply about consumer behavior around these trivia games.


First, why do we play these games? There are three forces at play here - the allure of winning cash prizes, the self-imposed sense of smartness, intelligence, or accomplishment, and an elevation of social status due to money/intelligence.

Cash is king. No matter how much money you have in your bank account, you always want to compete hard when there is money …

What Founders Should Learn from the Fyre Festival

I recently watched the Fyre Festival documentary on Netflix and left with an uneasy feeling in my stomach. The documentary is riveting and has something for everyone - shock, drama, emotion, financial fraud, supermodels, and Ja Rule. Most importantly, it was chock full of learnings for early stage entrepreneurs.

Fyre Festival was a massive trainwreck of a "luxury music festival" started by Billy McFarland and rapper Ja Rule. Propped up by massive influencers like Kendall Jenner, Bella Hadid, and Emily Ratajkowski, the festival failed to deliver even basic amenities such as housing and food on the day of the event. Currently, the organizers are the subject of atleast eight major lawsuits for fraud.

What can founders learn from this failed entertainment startup (other than DO NOT COMMIT FRAUD)?



The power of influencer marketing

Fyre Festival's popularity was built on top of a massive influencer marketing campaign. Top supermodels were paid top dollar to post cryptic photos …

The Autonomous Last Mile Delivery Hunger Games

Today, Fedex announced their same-day delivery robot which signals another major player throwing their hat into the 'autonomous delivery bot' ring - following in the footsteps of Amazon Scout, Softbank-backed Nuro, Marble, Kiwi, and others.
Recently, I have been researching and thinking about this space where it seems like technological differentiation is minimal. It is essentially an AI driven 'service' where other than load-bearing specifications and radius of service, the bots can only be differentiated on their looks.
According to this McKinsey Report (which every single robodelivery company cites), autonomous delivery robots/vehicles (what do we classify them as?) will be responsible for 80% of all last mile deliveries. This is mostly driven by this basic business objective - reducing cost.
Last mile delivery is the biggest cost driver in the delivery landscape. Because of economies of scale, it is cheaper to ship bulk items from a centralized location/warehouse t…