Skip to main content

DLive in a crowded streaming market

DLive is a brand-new blockchain based live streaming platform. Recently, it gained prominence as the world's #1 YouTuber, Pewdiepie announced that he would exclusively live stream on DLive. First, that exclusive partnership with him has be worth $$$. Second, we already have Twitch, YouTube Live, FB.GG, and Caffeine - does the world really need another live streaming platform?
I think there are 3 big questions that will decide how the live streaming industry pans out -
1) Are people loyal to platforms or streamers (or both)
Streaming is very personality-centric. YT tried poaching a bunch of big Twitch streamers away to YT Live and they took their communities with them. But does that mean that a) They had similar viewer/community sizes as they did on Twitch and b) did the community move entirely onto YT Live and stop going on Twitch (because their favorite streamer(s) are now on YT?
2) How many channels are viewers regularly watching?
If the average viewer is only watching one or two channels, it is much more likely that they will completely switch platforms if their favorite streamer switches platforms.However, if they are watching 20 or so streamers and one of them switches to YT, the viewer is more likely to watch both Twitch and YT. On one hand its good for the platform because it isn't losing its audience. But on the other, it means platform lock in and loyalty is low.
3) A big component of DLive's messaging is around monetary transfer
This doesn't affect the viewers/donators as much - more focus on the content creators from a revenue-split standpoint. Here the big Q - how many channels are people subbed to / how much money are viewers spending per month? If that number is the same for the viewers on Twitch and DLive, there isn't a cost advantage for the viewers.
 Let's see if any other big streamers hop on the DLive train and if the scam claims from some community members turn out to be true.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vanity, Greed, Trivia, and Platforms

Recently I started playing a trivia game called IQ Trivia on Twitter. This game is structurally very similar to the wildly popular HQ Trivia in that it has 12 questions and if you answer all 12 correctly, you split a cash prize with all the other winners. Now, I used to play HQ trivia religiously but gradually lost the drive to tune in every day, despite an upward momentum in their cash prize. I also played Cash Show and several other similar quiz formats to satiate my desire for competition.

However, recently when I restarted playing IQ Trivia, I spent some time thinking deeply about consumer behavior around these trivia games.


First, why do we play these games? There are three forces at play here - the allure of winning cash prizes, the self-imposed sense of smartness, intelligence, or accomplishment, and an elevation of social status due to money/intelligence.

Cash is king. No matter how much money you have in your bank account, you always want to compete hard when there is money …

What Founders Should Learn from the Fyre Festival

I recently watched the Fyre Festival documentary on Netflix and left with an uneasy feeling in my stomach. The documentary is riveting and has something for everyone - shock, drama, emotion, financial fraud, supermodels, and Ja Rule. Most importantly, it was chock full of learnings for early stage entrepreneurs.

Fyre Festival was a massive trainwreck of a "luxury music festival" started by Billy McFarland and rapper Ja Rule. Propped up by massive influencers like Kendall Jenner, Bella Hadid, and Emily Ratajkowski, the festival failed to deliver even basic amenities such as housing and food on the day of the event. Currently, the organizers are the subject of atleast eight major lawsuits for fraud.

What can founders learn from this failed entertainment startup (other than DO NOT COMMIT FRAUD)?



The power of influencer marketing

Fyre Festival's popularity was built on top of a massive influencer marketing campaign. Top supermodels were paid top dollar to post cryptic photos …

The Autonomous Last Mile Delivery Hunger Games

Today, Fedex announced their same-day delivery robot which signals another major player throwing their hat into the 'autonomous delivery bot' ring - following in the footsteps of Amazon Scout, Softbank-backed Nuro, Marble, Kiwi, and others.
Recently, I have been researching and thinking about this space where it seems like technological differentiation is minimal. It is essentially an AI driven 'service' where other than load-bearing specifications and radius of service, the bots can only be differentiated on their looks.
According to this McKinsey Report (which every single robodelivery company cites), autonomous delivery robots/vehicles (what do we classify them as?) will be responsible for 80% of all last mile deliveries. This is mostly driven by this basic business objective - reducing cost.
Last mile delivery is the biggest cost driver in the delivery landscape. Because of economies of scale, it is cheaper to ship bulk items from a centralized location/warehouse t…